Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
- Mar 03 (1)
- Mar 04 (1)
- Mar 06 (1)
- Mar 08 (1)
- Mar 09 (1)
- Mar 10 (1)
- Mar 11 (1)
- Mar 12 (1)
- Mar 13 (1)
- Mar 14 (1)
- Mar 15 (1)
- Mar 16 (1)
- Mar 17 (1)
- Mar 18 (1)
- Mar 19 (1)
- Mar 20 (3)
- Mar 21 (1)
- Mar 22 (1)
- Mar 23 (1)
- Mar 24 (1)
- Mar 25 (1)
- Mar 26 (1)
- Mar 27 (1)
- Mar 28 (1)
- Mar 29 (1)
- Mar 30 (1)
- Mar 31 (1)
- Apr 01 (1)
- Apr 02 (2)
- Apr 03 (1)
- Apr 04 (1)
- Apr 05 (1)
- Apr 06 (1)
- Apr 07 (1)
- Apr 08 (1)
- Apr 09 (1)
- Apr 10 (1)
- Apr 11 (1)
- Apr 12 (1)
- Apr 13 (2)
- Apr 15 (2)
- Apr 17 (1)
- Apr 18 (1)
- Apr 19 (1)
- Apr 20 (1)
- Apr 21 (1)
- Apr 22 (1)
- Apr 23 (1)
- Apr 24 (1)
- Apr 25 (2)
- Apr 27 (1)
- Apr 28 (1)
- Apr 29 (1)
- Apr 30 (1)
- May 01 (1)
- May 02 (1)
- May 03 (1)
- May 04 (1)
- May 05 (2)
- May 06 (2)
- May 07 (1)
- May 08 (1)
- May 09 (1)
- May 10 (1)
- May 11 (1)
- May 12 (1)
- May 13 (1)
- May 14 (2)
- May 16 (2)
- May 18 (1)
- May 19 (1)
- May 20 (1)
- May 21 (1)
- May 22 (1)
- May 23 (1)
- May 24 (1)
- May 26 (1)
- May 27 (1)
- May 28 (1)
- May 29 (1)
- May 30 (1)
- May 31 (1)
- Jun 01 (2)
- Jun 03 (1)
- Jun 04 (1)
- Jun 05 (1)
- Jun 06 (2)
- Jun 08 (1)
- Jun 10 (1)
- Jun 11 (1)
- Jun 12 (1)
- Jun 13 (1)
- Jun 15 (1)
- Jun 16 (1)
- Jun 17 (1)
- Jun 18 (1)
- Jun 19 (1)
- Jun 20 (1)
- Jun 23 (1)
- Jun 24 (1)
- Jun 25 (1)
- Jun 26 (1)
- Jun 27 (1)
- Jun 28 (1)
- Jun 30 (1)
- Jul 01 (1)
- Jul 02 (1)
- Jul 03 (1)
- Jul 04 (1)
- Jul 07 (1)
- Jul 08 (1)
- Jul 09 (1)
- Jul 10 (1)
- Jul 11 (1)
- Jul 14 (1)
- Jul 15 (1)
- Jul 16 (1)
- Jul 17 (1)
- Jul 18 (1)
- Jul 21 (1)
- Jul 22 (1)
- Jul 23 (1)
- Jul 24 (1)
- Jul 25 (1)
- Jul 28 (1)
- Jul 29 (1)
- Jul 30 (1)
- Jul 31 (1)
- Aug 01 (1)
- Aug 04 (1)
- Aug 05 (1)
- Aug 06 (1)
- Aug 07 (1)
- Aug 08 (1)
- Aug 11 (1)
- Aug 12 (1)
- Aug 13 (1)
- Aug 14 (1)
- Aug 15 (1)
- Aug 18 (1)
- Aug 19 (2)
- Aug 21 (1)
- Aug 22 (1)
- Aug 23 (1)
- Aug 25 (2)
- Aug 26 (2)
- Aug 27 (1)
- Aug 28 (1)
- Aug 29 (1)
- Sep 02 (1)
- Sep 03 (1)
- Sep 04 (1)
- Sep 05 (1)
- Sep 08 (1)
- Sep 09 (1)
- Sep 10 (1)
- Sep 11 (1)
- Sep 15 (1)
- Sep 16 (1)
- Sep 17 (1)
- Sep 18 (1)
- Sep 19 (1)
- Sep 22 (1)
- Sep 23 (1)
- Sep 24 (2)
- Sep 27 (1)
- Sep 29 (1)
- Sep 30 (1)
- Oct 01 (1)
- Oct 02 (1)
- Oct 06 (1)
- Oct 08 (1)
- Oct 09 (1)
- Oct 10 (1)
- Oct 13 (1)
- Oct 14 (1)
- Oct 16 (1)
- Oct 17 (1)
- Oct 18 (1)
- Oct 20 (2)
- Oct 22 (1)
- Oct 23 (2)
- Oct 27 (1)
- Oct 28 (2)
- Oct 30 (1)
- Oct 31 (1)
- Nov 03 (1)
- Nov 06 (1)
- Nov 07 (1)
- Nov 08 (1)
- Nov 11 (1)
- Nov 12 (1)
- Nov 13 (1)
- Nov 17 (3)
- Nov 18 (1)
- Nov 20 (1)
- Nov 24 (2)
- Nov 26 (1)
- Dec 01 (1)
- Dec 03 (1)
- Dec 04 (1)
- Dec 08 (1)
- Dec 09 (1)
- Dec 10 (2)
- Dec 12 (1)
- Dec 13 (1)
- Dec 14 (1)
- Dec 15 (1)
- Dec 16 (1)
- Dec 17 (1)
- Dec 18 (1)
- Dec 21 (1)
- Dec 26 (1)
- Dec 27 (1)
- Dec 28 (1)
- Dec 29 (1)
- Dec 30 (1)
- Dec 31 (1)
- Jan 02 (1)
- Jan 05 (1)
- Jan 06 (1)
- Jan 09 (1)
- Jan 10 (1)
- Jan 12 (2)
- Jan 13 (1)
- Jan 14 (1)
- Jan 16 (1)
- Jan 19 (1)
- Jan 22 (1)
- Jan 23 (1)
- Jan 27 (1)
- Jan 28 (1)
- Jan 29 (1)
- Jan 30 (1)
- Feb 02 (2)
- Feb 03 (1)
- Feb 05 (1)
- Feb 09 (1)
- Feb 10 (1)
- Feb 11 (1)
About Me
- Botgirl Questi
- A beautiful thought experiment personified through the imagined perspective of a self-aware avatar. My creator's site can is at http://fourworlds.tumblr.com
Actually, this is one I struggle with. Could I possibly be a very stupid person and ask for a caption? My brain's not turned on. ^^;
ReplyDeleteAwwwww, cute!
ReplyDelete(My interpretation is that various of A's selves and various of B's selves form a nice polyamorous family / polygon / graph / whathaveyou. But maybe that's just me. :) )
That's a neat idea , never thought of it beyond parallel ones. Now I've got to go give those alts some more money :/
ReplyDeleteHmm...my interpretation are all the different voices/personalities that live inside of each person's mind...so that in reality two singular people are actually in a relationship with a myriad of "people" via their partner's multi-faceted personality. That's my two coppers, anyway.
ReplyDeleteOf course, I could totally be wrong - I haven't had my black tea yet this morning. ^_^
ReplyDeleteThe image popped into my mind as I was noodling around, so there's no consciously directed meaning behind it. The title was a last minute addition to label the blog post.
ReplyDeleteAha! Ah well, I relate to Isadora's interpretation best, ad can see that working if I were one of those heads up there. :)
ReplyDeleteI may not understand what is not being understood (that would not be unusual). But here is what Wikipedia has to say (there is much more).
ReplyDelete"Polyamory (from Greek πολυ [poly, meaning many or several] and Latin amor [literally “love”]) is the desire, practice, or acceptance of having more than one loving, intimate relationship at a time with the full knowledge and consent of everyone involved. Polyamorous perspectives differ from monogamous perspectives, in that they reflect one or more partner's wish(es) to have further meaningful relationships and to accommodate these alongside their existing relationships."
I do think it has to be "two plus" to be poly. I have former colleague in California left over from "the 70s" who has subscribed to this since the days of "Open Marriage", which I think pre-ceeded the Officializing of Polyamory as a lifestyle. It is simple in theory, hehe, but may be difficult in practice for everyone but a few California subcultures. It sounds like the norm in some circles in Extropia, doesn't it? In an ideal world...
Is the concept different when applied to SL? I don't know. Does it matter whether some of the participants are in SL and some in RL? As in knowing that your partner has a virtual partner and not minding? Just providing the "academic" background. Probably no one is reading this thread any more anyhow. :-)
P.S. How come everyone leaves the nose out of the smiley face these days? Did I blank out for a few years? :-) :) I think I prefer having a nose even tho I'm a mouth breather.
elizabeth: I have another image planned to take it to the 2+ stage and illustrate the unique "parallel monogamy" practiced by some in Second Life and other virtual worlds. I've met quite a few people who have a monogamous relationship in the physical world with one person, and a second "monogamous" partnership between their avatar identity and someone in Second Life. (Not surprisingly, the RL partner usually doesn't like the arrangement if they know about it.)
ReplyDeleteHi Botgirl,
ReplyDeleteI forgot to add in the last post that I'm actually Chimera Cosmos. Blogger thinks I go by "elizabeth" which no one has called me since I got out of junior high. Well, maybe my grandmothers once or twice. :-)
I think I've got it fixed so that at least my photo gives a clue to my real...that is SL...identity. That's the only place I know you, of course.
Hope you are well.